Table 2. Outputs of logistic regression analyses for Guatemala and Mexico showing the influence of the spatially independent variables used to explain deforestation rates.
| |
| |
|
Country |
Variable |
Coefficient |
Coefficient SE |
Wald χ² |
p |
| |
|
Guatemala |
Distance to settlements |
−0.632 |
0.0829 |
58.094 |
< 0.0001 |
|
|
Buffer zone |
5.247 |
1.0116 |
26.900 |
< 0.0001 |
|
|
Seasonal wetlands |
−1.514 |
0.3010 |
25.286 |
< 0.0001 |
|
|
Inhabited multiple-use zone |
4.754 |
1.0174 |
21.833 |
< 0.0001 |
|
|
Inhabited protected area |
4.586 |
1.0094 |
20.644 |
< 0.0001 |
|
|
Recently inhabited forestry concessions |
4.036 |
1.0405 |
15.048 |
< 0.0001 |
|
|
Distance from roads |
−0.144 |
0.0411 |
12.354 |
< 0.0001 |
|
|
Distance to deforested areas |
−0.085 |
0.0252 |
11.519 |
0.001 |
|
|
Soil depth |
0.392 |
0.1377 |
8.081 |
0.004 |
|
|
Humid topographic index |
1.401 |
0.5192 |
7.287 |
0.007 |
|
|
Constant |
−1.676 |
1.5581 |
1.157 |
0.282 |
|
Mexico |
Distance to deforested areas |
−1.401 |
0.045 |
971.695 |
< 0.0001 |
|
|
Tropical semideciduous forest |
0.838 |
0.198 |
17.875 |
< 0.0001 |
|
|
Protected area status |
0.130 |
0.116 |
1.259 |
0.262 |
|
|
Tropical forest in wetlands |
−0.148 |
0.395 |
0.140 |
0.708 |
|
|
Ejido status |
−0.011 |
0.124 |
0.008 |
0.929 |
|
|
Constant |
7.418 |
0.337 |
483.987 |
< 0.0001 |
|
| |
|