Table 3. Restoration action and economic models. Possible restoration and preservation actions are identified in the first column. The landscape impact column describes how the action was implemented on the landscape in our modeling framework. A description of how each modeled action was translated into EDT input data is found in the Appendix. The economic model column describes the cost estimated for each action type. C = Project cost in $U.S. (C); W = Channel width (m).
| |
| |
|
Restoration or preservation action |
Economic model |
Modeled landscape impact |
| |
|
Culvert removal |
C = 178,430*ln(1.2W+0.61)-34,773 based on data from Evergreen Funding
Consultants (2003) |
Upstream reaches reclassified as passable, provided that they were
historically accessible to fish |
|
Riparian protection |
Forest lands: cost of lost riparian timber production = $U.S. 10,000/acre.
Nonforest lands: cost of acquisition (C/acre) depends on parcel size and
current land-use designation: forested (40–80 acre plot) = $U.S. 7080; forested
(>80/acre plot) = $U.S. 2856; open space = $U.S. 10,730; agriculture (min 20 acre
plot) = $U.S. 6820; rural (< 5 acre plot) = $U.S. 16,997; rural (5–l10 acre plot) =
$U.S. 14,456; rural (10–20 acre plot) = $U.S. 11,064; rural (min 20 acre plot) = $U.S. 7966;
urban residential = $U.S. 40,344; urban commercial = $U.S. 39,199
Note: Riparian areas were protected to 60 m, however the costs were only
calculated for the fraction of the riparian area not currently protected by
county, state, or federal riparian ordinances. |
Riparian functions and seral stage ↑ by one level when possible to
improve, and riparian land cover was reclassified to 20-yr forested. This
reduced the amount of sediment and hydrologic runoff entering the
reach. |
|
Riparian planting |
Riparian planting only occurred on areas in which costs were not prohibitive.
These included reaches for which > = 35% of the area within 20 m of the
channel was < 5% hillslope and > = 50% of the area within 20 m of the
channel was not in bare ground, shrubs, or short grass. The cost for riparian
planting was estimated as C/acre = $U.S. 15,000 (slope < 0.05). |
Riparian functions and seral stage ↑ to the best possible level, and
riparian land cover was re-classified to 20-yr forested. This reduced the
amount of sediment and hydrologic runoff entering the reach. |
|
In-stream restoration |
C/km = $78,593 |
Improved spawner capacity in reach by adjusting input variables.
Small streams (BFW ≤ 25 m): redds/km ↑ to 90th
percentile of estimated current values
Large streams (BFW > 25 m): spawnable area ↑ by 32% |
|
Floodplain restoration |
C/ stream km = $U.S. 155,507 |
Increased length of reach by 39.4% to represent inclusion of historical
side channels, as determined from aerial photographs. Habitat conditions were
inherited from existing reach, and may have been modified by other actions. An
outline of the floodplain for the Lewis River watershed (WDFW 2003) was used to
identify segments appropriate for side channel restoration unless specifically
identified in the landscape and expert strategies. All mainstem North
Fork, East Fork, and Upper North Fork segments within the floodplain boundaries
were considered, as well as tributaries that were within the extent of the
floodplain. |
|
Road decommissioning |
C/road km = $U.S. 12,427 |
Reduced length of existing roads by 95% in areas draining to reach; thereby
reducing sediment input |
|
Road repair |
C/road km = $U.S. 6214 |
Reduced length of existing roads by 50% in areas draining to reach; thereby
reducing sediment input |
|
| |
|