Table 3. Characteristics of the two groups of respondents identified through cluster analysis based on coded responses to the survey questions. Group characteristics are detailed in relation to responses at the sub-category level, how responses were articulated, the organizational composition of each group, the individual respondent’s experience and time working with Pacific CCAs.
| |
| |
|
Characteristics—Points of
Difference |
Group 1 |
Group 2 |
| |
|
Broad category level |
Sustainability |
Not a focus: 3% (n = 1) noted
sustainability in their success response |
Major focus: 100% (n = 31) noted
sustainability in their success response |
|
Sub-category level |
Adequate capacity to
manage |
Not a focus: Noted by 27% of this
group |
Major focus: Noted by 77% of this
group |
|
Sub-category level |
Type of support |
Not a focus: Noted by 35% of this
group |
Major focus: Noted by 74% of this
group |
|
How responses were
articulated |
Ingredient or Picture |
Majority (60%) noted the ingredients of
success |
Majority (59%) considered the picture of
success |
|
Group composition |
Organization composition |
Dominated by representatives from in-country
governments and local NGOs |
Dominated by representatives from funder
agencies (donors) and International NGOs |
|
Respondent experience |
a. Program (regional)
b. Program (country)
c. Project (system/site) |
a. 26%
b. 30%
c. 44% |
|
a. 61%
b. 23%
c. 16% |
|
|
Time |
< 5years
> 5years |
38% <5 years
62% >5 years |
50% <5years
50% >5 years |
|
| |
|