Table 4. Variation in livelihood strategies and pressures on C. strictum populations and habitat across villages in the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve.
| |
| |
|
State |
Village |
Livelihood Strategies |
Pressures on C. strictum populations and habitat |
| |
|
Kerala |
Maancheery |
Collection of forest products |
Low human populations but harvesters from other villages come to harvest,
therefore tenure system breaking down |
|
Kerala |
Alakal |
Wage labor & collection of forest products |
Medium pressure, many harvesters and local traders close by |
|
Kerala |
Appankaapu |
Wage labor & collection of forest products |
High pressure with many harvesters |
|
Kerala |
Thandankallu |
Total dependence on wage labor |
Low pressure—not traditional harvesters of resin |
|
Tamil Nadu |
Dhalamukh |
Wage labor & subsistence agriculture & collection of forest
products |
High pressure: high demand from local Badaga communities. Habitat loss due
to expansion of tea estates |
|
Tamil Nadu |
Semenarai |
Wage labor & subsistence agriculture & collection of forest
products |
High pressure: high demand from local Badaga communities. Habitat loss due
to expansion of tea estates |
|
Tamil Nadu |
Kavalkombei |
Wage labor & collection of forest products |
Low pressure—low human populations and large areas of forest |
|
Tamil Nadu |
Marikode |
Subsistence agriculture & wage labor & collection of forest
products |
Low pressure—low human populations and forest lands converted to tea
years ago |
|
| |
|