Table 4. Comparison fish conservation, unconstrained development, and combined conservation and development scenarios. The combined scenario shows inclusion of UGBs, both UGBs and agricultural and forest reserves, and without UGBs or agricultural and forest reserves. Reported scores are averages of multiple runs.

Scenario
Built
Farm
Forest
Other
Eco-health
Fish
Fish conservation
39.4
7.4
30.8
22.4
2.97
2.94
Combined with urban
growth boundaries
49.4
3.1
20.1
27.4
1.85
2.62
Combined with urban growth
boundaries, with reserve
50.4
11.0
17.7
20.9
1.20
2.59
Combined without urban
growth boundaries or reserve
56.4
4.3
16.8
22.5
0.28§
2.26§
Initial conditions
33.5
18.1
13.4
35.0
-1.29|
0.21|
Unconstrained development
62.5
3.9
8.4
25.2
-2.42
-1.66
Significance of t-test is p < 0.01, df varies.
Significance of t-test is p < 0.05, df varies.
§The results from the combined scenario without agricultural or forest reserves was chosen as the comparator variable.
|Initial conditions do not vary.