Table 4. Comparison fish conservation, unconstrained development, and combined conservation and development scenarios. The combined scenario shows inclusion of UGBs, both UGBs and agricultural and forest reserves, and without UGBs or agricultural and forest reserves. Reported scores are averages of multiple runs. Scenario Built Farm Forest Other Eco-health Fish Fish conservation 39.4 7.4 30.8 22.4 2.97† 2.94‡ Combined with urban growth boundaries 49.4 3.1 20.1 27.4 1.85† 2.62 Combined with urban growth boundaries, with reserve 50.4 11.0 17.7 20.9 1.20† 2.59 Combined without urban growth boundaries or reserve 56.4 4.3 16.8 22.5 0.28§ 2.26§ Initial conditions 33.5 18.1 13.4 35.0 -1.29| 0.21| Unconstrained development 62.5 3.9 8.4 25.2 -2.42† -1.66† †Significance of t-test is p < 0.01, df varies. ‡Significance of t-test is p < 0.05, df varies. §The results from the combined scenario without agricultural or forest reserves was chosen as the comparator variable. |Initial conditions do not vary.