Fig. 4. Gitga’at case study: five scenarios were created from individual interviews for the most common protection type where only aboriginal rights fisheries would be allowed: “a” all areas selected by any participant; “b” areas selected by 30% of participants; “c” areas selected by 50% of participants; “d” areas selected by 70% of participants; and “e” areas selected by all participants. “f” depicts the revised preferred protected areas based on feedback meetings. The areas noted on the map reflect participants’ interpretations of the traditional territory.