Table 4. Use of the actor analysis: effects of the actor analysis on project activities.
| |
| |
|
Case |
Substantive analysis |
Interaction process |
General learning and indirect effects |
| |
|
National water resources plan, Egypt |
Helped to generate more attention to the costs of policy
options and institutional reform |
Helped to clarify roles and responsibilities in
project committees |
Introduced a new perspective on interdependencies among
actors |
|
Diffuse pollution, Netherlands |
Helped to integrate diffuse and point-source
pollution |
Helped to expand the type of actors involved;
triggered reflection on the roles of actors in diffuse pollution
policy |
Enabled learning about the perceptions of
others |
|
River basin planning, Turkey |
Few direct effects |
Helped to start the interaction process and to prepare the first
workshop and training of local actors |
Enabled learning about a largely new and unknown project
environment |
|
Regional water management, Philippines |
Initiated effort to take into account concerns and solutions
from three main actor groups |
Initiated effort to include actors from all three groups in
project activities; provided a basis for the first stakeholder
workshop |
Enabled learning and updating of knowledge about perceptions
and awareness of actors |
|
| |
|