Table 2. Actor analysis output that had implications for substantive problem analysis.
| |
| |
|
Case |
Expand the scope of the initial problem
formulation |
Adjust the importance of components in the initial problem
formulation |
Describe parts of the problem related to
actors |
| |
|
National water resources plan, Egypt |
Need to specify costs and benefits of
options |
Importance of ongoing institutional reform
debate |
Policy options as viewed by actors; interdependence among
actors |
|
Diffuse pollution, Netherlands |
Need to integrate diffuse pollution with point-source
pollution in policy analysis |
Decision makers’ and experts’ priorities for pollution reduction differ
|
Articulation of tacit knowledge of need for better
communication; motivations and rationale of polluters |
|
River basin planning, Turkey |
Need to address water scarcity in addition to water
quality |
Perceived importance of boron pollution; problems perceived
at both institutional and operational levels |
Level of expertise and cooperation among local actors;
opinions of actors regarding a new river basin authority |
|
Regional water management, Philippines |
Need to address equity issues and the use of economic mechanisms
in water management |
Three main groups are important for water management, but one of
these is currently excluded from the debate |
Actors’ perspectives on water management are grouped into
three main categories; level of awareness of actors for water management
issues |
|
| |
|