Table 1. Performance of biodiversity goal-setting methods on seven conditions (in columns) for effective use in multifunctional landscape planning.
| |
| |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
Low-level ecological expertise suffices |
Ecosystem based, with species requirements |
Suitable for regions with fragmented ecosystems |
Shifts between aspiration levels for biodiversity |
Application in multifunctional landscapes possible |
Up- and downscaling easy |
Adaptable in local setting |
| |
Single-species approaches. Flagship, keystone, umbrella |
+ |
◊ |
◊ |
◊ |
◊ |
◊ |
◊ |
|
Focal species approach, systematically selected |
◊ |
+ |
+ |
◊ |
+ |
+ |
◊ |
|
Focal species selected by regional experts |
◊ |
+ |
+ |
◊ |
+ |
◊ |
+ |
|
Landscape species approach |
◊ |
+ |
_ |
◊ |
◊ |
◊ |
+ |
|
Multispecies reserve selection optimizations |
_ |
+ |
_ |
_ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
Conservation action planning (CAP) |
_ |
+ |
_ |
_ |
_ |
_ |
+ |
|
| |
|