Table 3. Qualitative scores of basins on criteria for adaptive management (- = low, 0 = average, + = high)
| |
| |
|
|
Criterion |
Orange |
Rhine |
| |
|
A. |
Actor networks (Average 1–4) |
0 |
0 / + |
|
1. |
Cross-sectoral cooperation |
- |
0 |
|
2. |
Cooperation between administrative levels |
0 |
0 |
|
3. |
Cooperation across administrative boundaries |
0 |
+ |
|
4. |
Broad stakeholder participation |
0 |
+ |
|
B. |
Legal framework (Average 5–6) |
- / 0 |
0 / + |
|
5. |
Appropriate legal framework |
- |
+ |
|
6. |
Adaptable legislation |
0 |
0 |
|
C. |
Policy (Average 7–11) |
0 |
+ |
|
7. |
Long time horizon |
0 |
+ |
|
8. |
Flexible measures, keeping options open |
0 |
+ |
|
9. |
Experimentation |
0 |
0 |
|
10. |
Full consideration of possible measures |
0 |
+ |
|
11. |
Actual implementation of policies |
- |
+ |
|
D. |
Information management (Average 12–17) |
- / 0 |
0 / + |
|
12. |
Joint / participative information production |
0 |
+ |
|
13. |
Interdisciplinarity |
|
0 |
|
14. |
Elicitation of mental models / critical self-reflection about
assumptions |
|
|
|
15. |
Explicit consideration of uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
|
16. |
Broad communication |
|
+ |
|
17. |
Use of information |
- |
0 |
|
E. |
Financing (18) |
- |
+ |
|
18. |
Appropriate financing system |
- |
+ |
|
| |
|