Table 1. Results of a survey concerning the pros and cons of living in and out of the forest
| |
| |
|
Living in the forest (Upper Tubu) |
Living out of the forest (Respen
Sembuak) |
| |
|
Positive |
Positive |
|
Forest products for food |
77% |
Access to dispensary |
76% |
|
Land for swidden cultivation |
65% |
Access to education |
58% |
|
Forest products for material |
55% |
Access to information |
37% |
|
Forest products for cash |
21% |
Work opportunities |
33% |
|
Sharing / mutual work |
20% |
Electricity |
26% |
|
|
|
Transportation |
25% |
|
|
|
Rice mills |
22% |
| |
|
Negative |
Negative |
|
No health care |
67% |
Lack of security |
62% |
|
Basic goods expensive |
59% |
Drugs and alcohol |
54% |
|
Poor accessibility |
41% |
Loss of Punan culture |
46% |
|
No rice mill available |
33% |
Lack of access to agricultural land |
35% |
|
No government subsidies |
31% |
Competition with other groups |
29% |
|
|
|
Weakening of customary rules |
22% |
|
|
|
No forest products for food |
22% |
|
| |
|