Table 2. Examples of quantitative network measures and how they are related to different network characteristics.
| |
| |
| Characteristic |
|
Measure |
| |
| Density |
|
Number of links divided by the number of nodes in the network. |
|
|
|
| Reachability |
|
Diameter, i.e., the number of steps maximally needed to
reach from one node to any other node in the network. |
|
|
Number of components. A component is an independent network
within the larger network in which all nodes are directly
or indirectly in contact with each other. If a network consists
of more than one component, it is considered fragmented; the
degree of fragmentation is quantified by measuring the number
of components. |
|
|
|
| Betweenness |
|
A measure that quantifies the degree of betweenness (Freeman
1979), i.e., how much each node contributes to minimizing
the distance between nodes in the network (compare with reachability
above). This measure can be applied to individual nodes, and
can then be used to identify the actors that contribute most
to linking the network. The measure can also be applied to
the network as a whole to quantify the degree of modularity,
i.e., separation into smaller groups or modules. |
|
|
|
| Centrality |
|
The degree of centrality indicates how many links a node
has (Freeman 1979). This measure can be applied to individual
nodes or the whole network. A high degree of centrality for
an individual node indicates that it has many links compared
to other nodes. Centrality for the whole network indicates
the tendency in the network for a few actors to have many
links, e.g., a wheel-star structure. |
|
| |
|