Table 10. Hypothetical example of the matrix of information that could be developed for each part of a river basin. The indicators would differ from river to river, and the numbers used here are merely to illustrate possible trends in indicator status. The numbers do not constitute a scoring system; rather, the specialists’ reports should be referred to for the detail represented by each numbered cell. Decisions should be based on this underlying information. Ratings of change: 1= negligible change from present; 2 = low change; 3 = moderate change; 4 = high change; 5 = very high change. Negative values indicate either that the river ecosystem is moving away from its natural state, i.e. degrading, or a compensation/mitigation cost.
| | | |
|
Indicators
|
Flow scenarios reflecting increasing levels of basin development
|
| |
|
|
Present
|
I
|
II
|
III
|
IV
|
V
|
VI
|
|
Development benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HEP production
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
|
Crop production
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
|
Water security
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
|
National economy
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
|
Aquaculture
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
|
Development costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fish production
|
0
|
-1
|
-1
|
-1
|
-2
|
-4
|
-5
|
|
Water quality
|
0
|
-1
|
-3
|
-4
|
-4
|
-5
|
-5
|
|
Floodplain functions
|
0
|
-1
|
-1
|
-2
|
-2
|
-2
|
-3
|
|
Cultural and religious use of river
|
0
|
-1
|
-1
|
-3
|
-4
|
-5
|
-5
|
|
Compensation for lost resources
|
0
|
-1
|
-2
|
-2
|
-3
|
-3
|
-4
|
| | |
|