Table 1. Defining characteristics of the four scenarios
| |
| |
|
|
Global Orchestration
|
Order from Strength
|
Adapting Mosaic
|
TechnoGarden
|
| |
Dominant Approach for
Sustainability
|
Sustainable development, economic growth, public
goods
|
Reserves, parks, national-level policies,
conservation
|
Local–regional co-management, common-property
institutions
|
Green-technology, eco-efficiency, tradable ecological
property rights
|
Economic Approach
|
Fair Trade (reduction of tariff boundaries), with
enhancement of global public goods
|
Regional trade blocs, mercantilism
|
Integration of local rules regulates trade; local
non-market rights
|
Global reduction of tariff boundaries, fairly free
movement of goods, capital, and people, global markets in ecological
property
|
Social Policy Foci
|
Improve world; global public health; global
education
|
Security and protection
|
Local communities linked to global communities; local
equity important
|
Technical expertise valued; follow opportunity;
competition; openness
|
Dominant social organizations
|
Trans-national
companies
(Companies that spread seamlessly across many
countries); global NGO and multi-lateral organizations
|
Multi-national
companies
(Companies that consist of loose alliances of largely
separate franchises in different countries)
|
Local co-operatives, global partnerships and
collaborations established as local groupings recognize the need to share
experiences and solutions
|
Trans-national, professional associations,
NGOs
|
|
| |
|