Table 3. Sensitivity of the performance of a system to differences in centrality.
| | |
| Centrality |
|
Advantages |
|
Disadvantages |
| |
| High |
|
Efficient coordination when solving simple tasks (see Langan-Fox 2001 and references therein)
Potential to be more accountable, i.e., the central actors can to some extent be held responsible for the group |
|
Reduced distribution of information (e.g., Shaw 1981) |
| |
|
Possible perception as undemocratic and unfair |
| |
|
Greater vulnerability to targeted attacks (Albert et al. 2000) |
| |
| Low |
|
Possible perception as more fair and open to group participation |
|
Possible lack of control and accountability
Inefficiency when solving simple tasks |
| |
Robustness to removal of nodes (e.g., social leader or species) |
|
| |
High group efficiency when solving complex tasks (see Langan-Fox 2001 and references therein) |
|
| | |
|