Ecology and Society Ecology and Society
E&S Home > Vol. 18, Iss. 4 > Art. 8 > Discuss Open Access Publishing 


Do Adaptive Comanagement Processes Lead to Adaptive Comanagement Outcomes? A Multicase Study of Long-term Outcomes Associated with the National Riparian Service Teamís Place-based Riparian Assistance. 2013. Smedstad, J. A. and H. Gosnell

  • Discussion (1 comments)
  • Register

To start or join a discussion you need an account.  You already have an account if you have worked as a reviewer, author, editor, or have previously submitted comments.  Otherwise you need to register (use the register button below).  We do not share your information nor will we start sending you newsletters. To comment click the 'Sign In and Comment' button below.

In some versions of Internet Explorer (eg: 10) you may be required to set the Compatibility View option to submit comments to the discussion form (Go to "Tools" in the menu bar and ensure there is a check beside "compatibility view").

Author submitted discussion question
David Galat on Nov 13, 2013 14:20:59

Authors of each paper in this Special Issue submitted a question to stimulate interactive communication among readers and authors.  You are encouraged to initiate a dialog by responding to the following question:


Are there concrete examples of the emergence of institutions or governance arrangements that support ongoing collaborative adaptive management in the context of public lands in the American West?  Specifically, are there examples of "authentic dialogue" about alternative future management scenarios?  What role do federal laws and policies play in precluding possibilities for CAM as characterized in the literature (especially the "authentic dialogue" requirement)?  How would they need to be modified to allow for it?

Ecology and Society. ISSN: 1708-3087