Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design
Jennifer L. Shirk,
Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Department of Program Development and EvaluationHeidi L. Ballard,
University of California Davis, School of EducationCandie C. Wilderman,
Environmental Studies Department, Dickinson CollegeTina Phillips,
Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Department of Program Development and EvaluationAndrea Wiggins,
DataONE, University of New MexicoRebecca Jordan,
Rutgers University, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural ResourcesEllen McCallie,
Carnegie Museum of Natural HistoryMatthew Minarchek,
Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Department of Program Development and EvaluationBruce V Lewenstein,
Department of Communication, Cornell UniversityMarianne E Krasny,
Department of Natural Resources, Cornell UniversityRick Bonney,
Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Department of Program Development and Evaluation
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04705-170229
Full Text: HTML 
Download Citation
Abstract
Members of the public participate in scientific research in many different contexts, stemming from traditions as varied as participatory action research and citizen science. Particularly in conservation and natural resource management contexts, where research often addresses complex social–ecological questions, the emphasis on and nature of this participation can significantly affect both the way that projects are designed and the outcomes that projects achieve. We review and integrate recent work in these and other fields, which has converged such that we propose the term public participation in scientific research (PPSR) to discuss initiatives from diverse fields and traditions. We describe three predominant models of PPSR and call upon case studies suggesting that—regardless of the research context—project outcomes are influenced by (1) the degree of public participation in the research process and (2) the quality of public participation as negotiated during project design. To illustrate relationships between the quality of participation and outcomes, we offer a framework that considers how scientific and public interests are negotiated for project design toward multiple, integrated goals. We suggest that this framework and models, used in tandem, can support deliberate design of PPSR efforts that will enhance their outcomes for scientific research, individual participants, and social–ecological systems.
Key words
citizen science, community-based monitoring, conservation, outcomes, participation, public, volunteer monitoring
Ecology and Society. ISSN: 1708-3087