Balancing Accuracy and Meaning in Common-Pool Resource Theory
Michael Cox, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University; Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University
Full Text: HTML
Common-pool resources are managed in complex environments that are amenable to understanding, analysis, and management at multiple levels. This paper develops a heuristic criterion to identify the costs and benefits of adopting various levels of analysis when constructing theory for common-pool resource management. It argues that there is no single optimal level for such analysis. Instead, a trade-off is posed where theories at higher levels tend to be more accurate but less meaningful than theories at lower levels.
common-pool resources; complexity; institutional analysis; scale