From LTER to LTSER: Conceptualizing the Socioeconomic Dimension of Long-term Socioecological Research
Helmut Haberl,
Institute of Social Ecology, IFF Vienna, Klagenfurt UniversityVerena Winiwarter,
Dept. of Cultural Analysis, IFF Vienna, Klagenfurt UniversityKrister Andersson,
University of Colorado, Boulder, ColoradoRobert U. Ayres,
INSEAD, Fountainebleau and IIASA, LaxenburgChristopher Boone,
School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Global Institute of Sustainability,Alicia Castillo,
Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de MexicGeoff Cunfer,
Department of History, University of SaskatchewanMarina Fischer-Kowalski,
Institute of Social Ecology, IFF Vienna, Klagenfurt UniversityWilliam R. Freudenburg,
Environmental Studies Programme, University of California, Santa BarbaraEeva Furman,
Finnish Environment Institute, SYKERüdiger Kaufmann,
Dept. of Zoology and Limnology, University of InnsbruckFridolin Krausmann,
Institute of Social Ecology, IFF Vienna, AustriaErnst Langthaler,
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Rural History, St. PöltenHermann Lotze-Campen,
PIK – Potsdam Institute of Climate Impact ResearchMichael Mirtl,
Federal Environment Agency AustriaCharles L. Redman,
International Institute for Sustainability, Arizona State UniversityAnette Reenberg,
Institute of Geography, University of CopenhagenAndrew Wardell,
Institute of Geography, University of CopenhagenBenjamin Warr,
INSEAD, FountainebleauHarald Zechmeister,
Vienna Ecology Centre, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna
Full Text: HTML 
Download Citation
Abstract
Concerns about global environmental change challenge long term ecological research (LTER) to go beyond traditional disciplinary scientific research to produce knowledge that can guide society toward more sustainable development. Reporting the outcomes of a 2 d interdisciplinary workshop, this article proposes novel concepts to substantially expand LTER by including the human dimension. We feel that such an integration warrants the insertion of a new letter in the acronym, changing it from LTER to LTSER, “Long-Term Socioecological Research,” with a focus on coupled socioecological systems. We discuss scientific challenges such as the necessity to link biophysical processes to governance and communication, the need to consider patterns and processes across several spatial and temporal scales, and the difficulties of combining data from in-situ measurements with statistical data, cadastral surveys, and soft knowledge from the humanities. We stress the importance of including prefossil fuel system baseline data as well as maintaining the often delicate balance between monitoring and predictive or explanatory modeling. Moreover, it is challenging to organize a continuous process of cross-fertilization between rich descriptive and causal-analytic local case studies and theory/modeling-oriented generalizations. Conceptual insights are used to derive conclusions for the design of infrastructures needed for long-term socioecological research.
Key words
communication; governance; land use; long-term ecological research (LTER); long-term socioecological research (LTSER); scale; society-nature interaction; socioecological metabolism; socioecological systems.
Ecology and Society. ISSN: 1708-3087